Len Ochs, Ph.D.
Flexyx, LLC
106 La Casa Via, Suite 110
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
Telephone: 510.906.0422
Len Ochs, Ph.D.
Ten consecutively-admitted outpatient mild-to-moderate traumatic closed
head injury patients, 2.5 years post accident, were given an average of
six 20-minute sessions of EEG-driven photic stimulation following a flexibility-re-establishment
(disentrainment) paradigm. Treatments consisted of 20-minute exposures
of EEG-driven photic stimulation. The dominant EEG, between 1 and 40 Hz
was extracted 128 times a second and used to reset the strobe frequency
128 times a second. The strobe frequency was then offset from the dominant
frequeny either plus or minus 5 Hz. Polarity of offset was alternated each
minute. Session were given daily.
After treatment, eight of the ten were self-described as having more energy
during the day, better sleeping at night, much less depression, irritability,
and explosiveness, better sense of humor and assertiveness, better concentration,
much greater ability to get things done (without ambivalence), and increased
ability to absorb written and verbal information. Their sensitivity to
the intensity of the light stimulation was the best predictor of speed
of recovery: others more hypersensitive took longer by a factor of more
than three-to-four to reach the same results. More subtle neuropsychological
skill recovery was not observed during the initial six sessions. While
some patients had histories of seizures, no seizure activity was reported
or observed. Some symptom exacerbation remained until management of the
hypersensitivity phenomenon was adequately managed and desensitization
to the photic stimulation could take place.
This treatment is non-cognitive and non-psychotherapeutic, as compared
to traditional EEG biofeedback treatment methods, which involve operantly
increasing the presence of higher frequency EEG activity while inhibiting
lower frequency activity predominant in head injury. This method follows
a flexibility-induction paradigm rather than specific-frequency enhancement
and inhibition. While non-contingent stimulation rather than operant conditioning
was used, EEG activity results were similar to those obtained in EEG biofeedback,
except obtained in 20% the typical treatment time.
![]()